Principal Protection Notes: Timely Warning from the SEC?

Jumat, 03 Juni 2011 0 komentar

For the past two years we have been investigating investor claims regarding principal protection notes and the litigation and arbitrations that have followed. Millions of dollars have been lost in these notes.

Today the SEC demonstrated one of the more significant issues with its regulatory program - closing the barn door after the horses are gone. Today, years after these sales of principal protection notes to thousands of investors, the SEC's  Office of Investor Education and Advocacy and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an investor alert regarding the product. Years after the fact.

The alert, called Structured Notes with Principal Protection: Note the Terms of Your Investment is intended to educate investors about the risks of structured notes with principal protection, and to help them understand how these complex financial products work. While the SEC correctly notes that the retail market for these notes has grown in recent years, it completely overlooks the fact that thousands of investors have already lost hundreds of millions of dollars in these notes.

Structured notes with principal protection typically combine a zero-coupon bond – which pays no interest until the bond matures — with an option or other derivative product whose payoff is linked to an underlying asset, index or benchmark. The underlying asset, index or benchmark can vary widely, from commonly cited market benchmarks to currencies, commodities and spreads between interest rates. The investor is entitled to participate in a return that is linked to a specified change in the value of the underlying asset. However, investors should know that these notes might be structured in a way such that their upside exposure to the underlying asset, index or benchmark is limited or capped.

Investors who hold these notes until maturity will typically get back at least some of their investment, even if the underlying asset, index or benchmark declines. But protection levels vary, with some of these products guaranteeing as little as 10 percent — and any guarantee is only as good as the financial strength of the company that makes that promise.

“Structured notes with principal protection contain risks that may surprise many investors and can have payout structures that are difficult to understand,” said Lori J. Schock, Director of the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy. “This alert is a ‘must read’ for investors considering these products, especially those with the mistaken belief that these investments offer complete downside protection.”

“The current low interest rate environment might make the potentially higher yields offered by structured notes with principal protection enticing to investors,” said FINRA Senior Vice President for Investor Education John Gannon. “But retail investors should realize that chasing a higher yield by investing in these products could mean winding up with an expensive, risky, complex and illiquid investment.”

Our firm has been advising investors and financial advisors who were mislead by the wirehouses regarding the safety of principal protection notes since 2008, and continues to do so. If you have any questions about such cases, feel free to contact us at ppn@beamlaw.com

 

FINRA Fines Credit Suisse $4.5M; Merrill Lynch $3M - Financial Planning

Selasa, 31 Mei 2011 0 komentar

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has hit Credit Suisse Securities LLC with a $4.5 million fine and Merrill Lynch with a $3 million fine for not properly representing data and supervising the residential subprime mortgage securitizations they sold.
The fines, which were announced by independent regulator FINRA on Thursday, were for improper handling that took place at the firms in 2006 and 2007. Each firm’s violation prevented certain investors from adequately understanding the nuances of residential subprime mortgage securities (RMBS), according to FINRA’s investigation.
RMBS are subject to certain disclosure rules when they are sold. Firms are required to provide investors with past delinquency rates for similar financial products. They are also required to tell investors how they calculated those delinquency rates.
Both Credit Suisse and Merrill Lynch failed to adequately follow those rules, according to FINRA.

SEC Charges in Auto Loan Provider With Promissory Note Fraud

Senin, 30 Mei 2011 0 komentar
SEC Charges Subprime Auto Loan Lender and Executives with Fraud; 2011-92; April 13, 2011
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Massachusetts-based subprime auto loan provider Inofin Inc. and three company executives with misleading investors about their lending activities and diverting millions of dollars in investor funds for their personal benefit. The SEC also charged two sales agents with illegally offering to sell company securities without being registered with the SEC as broker-dealers.

Even The Regulators Are Trading On Insider Information?

Jumat, 27 Mei 2011 0 komentar

SEC Charges Former NASDAQ Managing Director with Insider Trading; 2011-117; May 26, 2011

 

The SEC charged a former managing director of The NASDAQ Stock Market with insider trading on confidential information that he stole while working in a market intelligence unit that communicates with companies in advance of market-moving public announcements. 

The SEC alleges that Donald L. Johnson traded in advance of such public announcements as corporate leadership changes, earnings reports and forecasts, and regulatory approvals of new pharmaceutical products. He often placed the illegal trades directly from his work computer through an online brokerage account in his wife’s name. Johnson obtained illicit trading profits of more than $755,000 during a three-year period.

Johnson also has been charged in a parallel criminal action announced by the U.S. Department of Justice today.

“This case is the insider trading version of the fox guarding the henhouse,” said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Instead of protecting NASDAQ client confidences, Johnson secretly traded on client information for personal gain, even using his NASDAQ office computer to make the trades.”

 

Investment Adviser Charged With Fraud in NY Real Estate Funds

Senin, 16 Mei 2011 0 komentar

The SEC has charged a Monticello, N.Y.-based investment adviser with fraudulently offering and selling securities in two upstate New York real estate funds he managed.

The SEC alleges that the adviser told investors in the Gaffken & Barriger Fund (G&B Fund) that it was a relatively safe and liquid investment that generated a minimum return of 8 percent per year. However, the fund’s actual performance did not justify these performance claims. The SEC further alleges that he defrauded investors in Campus Capital Corp. by raising money from them to prop up the ailing G&B Fund without disclosing that was how their money was actually being used. The Commission also alleges that the adviser caused Campus to engage in other transactions that personally benefitted him, unbeknownst to Campus investors.

According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, the G&B Fund raised approximately $20 million from January 1998 to March 2008, and Campus raised approximately $12 million from October 2001 to July 2008. Barriger froze the G&B Fund in March 2008 and disclosed its true financial condition to investors.

The press release contains a link to the complaint - SEC Charges Investment Adviser With Defrauding Investors in Two Upstate New York Real Estate Funds

 

Rajaratnam Convicted in Galleon Group Insider Trading Case

Rabu, 11 Mei 2011 0 komentar

IN a case that prosecutors claim is the largest insider trading case involving a hedge fund, Raj Rajaratnam was convicted of five conspiracy counts and nine securities fraud charges after a seven week jury trial in the Southern District of New York. 

Prosecutors had alleged the 53-year-old Rajaratnam made profits and avoided losses totaling more than $60 million from illegal tips.

Hedge fund founder convicted in inside-trade case

More Fraud Charges Against UBS

Kamis, 05 Mei 2011 0 komentar
The hits just keep on coming.  UBS has paid huge fines for Auction Rate Securities fraud, Principal Protection Note fraud, and tax fraud, as well as losing case after case to its own investors who purchased Lehman Principal Protection Notes. Now it has settled fraud charges with the SEC which accused the firm of fraudulently rigging at least 100 municipal bond reinvestment transactions in 36 states and generating millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains.

UBS has agreed to pay $47.2 million that will be returned to the affected municipalities. UBS and its affiliates also agreed to pay $113 million to settle parallel cases brought by other federal and state authorities.

SEC Charges UBS with Fraudulent Bidding Practices Involving Investment of Municipal Bond Proceeds; 2011-105; May 4, 2011